The Conservative Cave© - A Conservative Political Forum
April 20, 2014, 12:48:48 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to The Conservative Cave©!
Join in the discussion!  Click HERE to register.
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Revenue Vs. Expenses Pie Chart  (Read 2984 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Janice
Hero Member
*****

Reputation: +169/-101
Offline Offline

Posts: 1446


This election is about paychecks v. food stamps


WWW

Ignore
« on: March 01, 2011, 04:00:35 pm »


This helps to understand America's financial mess

Here's The Only Chart You Need To See To Understand Why The US Is Screwed
Business Insider

We're still working our way through Kleiner Perkins' partner Mary Meeker's excellent analysis of the financial condition of the United States. We'll be breaking out some key sections in the next few days. In the meantime, here's the one chart you need to see to understand why the US is screwed. This is the "income statement" of the United States in 2010.  "Revenue" is on the left.  "Expenses" are on the right.

Note a few things...

1) First, "Revenue" is tiny relative to "Expenses."

2) Second, most of the expense is entitlement programs, not defense, education, or any of the other line items that most budget crusaders normally howl about.

3) Third, as horrifying as these charts are, they don't even show the trends of these two pies: The "expense" pie is growing like gangbusters, driven by the explosive growth of the entitlement programs that no one in government even has the balls to talk about. "Revenue" is barely growing at all.

As we'll illustrate with more of Mary's charts next week, the US cannot grow its way out of this problem. It needs to cut spending, specifically entitlement spending. We hereby announce that we'll give a special gold star to the first "leader" with the guts to say that publicly.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

These expenses are continuing to grow and grow and grow.  Pretty soon the income on the left is gonna be the size of the earth to the moon by comparison. This amply illustrates the problem that we have. And that growth alone is not going equalize these two pies in size.  It's going to require spending cuts.

We've all heard it, now we can see it. SPENDING CUTS is what its all about now ... and not just in Wisconsin.


HT to the EIB
Logged

Reagan bankrupted the Soviet Empire ...

Obama is bankrupting the American Republic
mark1
Probationary (Probie)


Reputation: +16/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 13





Ignore
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2011, 09:33:51 am »

this is why we, as a country, are in trouble:

Logged
SGT Snuggle Bunny
Topic Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Reputation: +1511/-243
Offline Offline

Posts: 18643


Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2011, 10:01:28 am »

Pretty much.

I s'pose if our GDP we $30T/year it would be so bad but it ain't, so it is.
Logged

If it weren't for their brains nothing about a liberal would be washed.
Thor
General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Reputation: +354/-267
Offline Offline

Posts: 12702


Native Texan & US Navy (ret)



« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2011, 11:21:32 am »

Mark1, it's customary to  introduce one's self when coming into a new forum if a place is provided. It just so happens that we have exactly that place: http://www.conservativeca.../index.php/board,8.0.html
Logged

"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."- IBID

"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated."-Thomas Jefferson
mark1
Probationary (Probie)


Reputation: +16/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 13





Ignore
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2011, 11:51:08 am »

The scary thing is, even if we eliminate the entire DOD (which I am not advocating), we will still be in deficit due to entitlement spending. The age at which the younger generation will collect government benefits will have to rise above 65 to avoid catastrophe.   
Logged
SGT Snuggle Bunny
Topic Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Reputation: +1511/-243
Offline Offline

Posts: 18643


Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #5 on: March 02, 2011, 12:03:52 pm »

The scary thing is, even if we eliminate the entire DOD (which I am not advocating), we will still be in deficit due to entitlement spending. The age at which the younger generation will collect government benefits will have to rise above 65 to avoid catastrophe.   
Thats because the adults sold them down the river...with all that the term implies.
Logged

If it weren't for their brains nothing about a liberal would be washed.
zeitgeist
Hero Member
*****

Reputation: +221/-38
Offline Offline

Posts: 4731


DU No Change just Pocket Lint




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2011, 05:09:50 am »

Great chart.  I will be putting that to good use.  It is hard to refute political ammo.  Leftwingers love pictures.  I plan to show 'em this.

^5
Logged

"Extreme taxation, excessive contros, oppressive government competition with business, frustrated minorities and forgotten Americans are not the products of free enterprise. They are the residue of centralized bureaucracy, of government by a self-anointed elite."  Ronald Reagan ~ (1911-2004) 40th US President

If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking. ~ George S. Patton

Don't Worry DUmmy, come the revolution those hoards of ammunition will be redistributed.  Be patient, You'll get yours !

Capitalism puts the gun in your hand. Fascism, Communism, & Socialism put the gun to your head.
Janice
Hero Member
*****

Reputation: +169/-101
Offline Offline

Posts: 1446


This election is about paychecks v. food stamps


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2011, 04:48:50 pm »



Its too bad the current republican 'leadership' is so milktoast in their budget cut proposals. You dont just put a band-aid on a bullet wound and call it a day.

If we cant replace them with more tea party candidates this next election, it could be too late for much of anything except the crying. We need LEADERS more interested in whats best for our country (in the long run) than what the news media is going to say about them or getting re-elected (in the short run).

The left wing nut-jobs in the White House and in government in general are going to scream and holler no matter what 'cuts' are proposed. So we might as well go for the jugular. And close the stupid govt down if necessary too. It wont stop necessary services, but its what we elected them to do. We have to stop... then reverse this train ... or we are headed off a cliff to be certain.
Logged

Reagan bankrupted the Soviet Empire ...

Obama is bankrupting the American Republic
Jmartin
Just Off Probation
*

Reputation: +7/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 120





Ignore
« Reply #8 on: March 03, 2011, 11:18:03 pm »



Its too bad the current republican 'leadership' is so milktoast in their budget cut proposals. You dont just put a band-aid on a bullet wound and call it a day.

If we cant replace them with more tea party candidates this next election, it could be too late for much of anything except the crying. We need LEADERS more interested in whats best for our country (in the long run) than what the news media is going to say about them or getting re-elected (in the short run).

The left wing nut-jobs in the White House and in government in general are going to scream and holler no matter what 'cuts' are proposed. So we might as well go for the jugular. And close the stupid govt down if necessary too. It wont stop necessary services, but its what we elected them to do. We have to stop... then reverse this train ... or we are headed off a cliff to be certain.

It took the Govt. being shut down to fix the budget last time. The Dems are just to  stubborn to have it happen before hand. I say no more temporary budget bills, and let it come to a halt.
Logged
docstew
Hero Member
*****

Reputation: +167/-180
Offline Offline

Posts: 3719


My Wife is awesome!




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2011, 02:04:36 pm »

It took the Govt. being shut down to fix the budget last time. The Dems are just to  stubborn to have it happen before hand. I say no more temporary budget bills, and let it come to a halt.

Or if they must do temporary budgets, do one every week and cut something else every time.  When I say cut, I mean zero it out.
Logged
mark1
Probationary (Probie)


Reputation: +16/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 13





Ignore
« Reply #10 on: March 08, 2011, 01:40:35 pm »

Government payouts—including Social Security, Medicare and unemployment insurance—make up more than a third of total wages and salaries of the U.S. population, a record figure that will only increase if action isn’t taken before the majority of Baby Boomers enter retirement.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/41969508
Logged
sandnsea
Probationary (Probie)


Reputation: +0/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 1





Ignore
« Reply #11 on: April 20, 2011, 12:36:09 am »

865 social security revenue - 707 social security benefits = 158 billion surplus. Entitlements are not causing the deficit.
Logged
NHSparky
Hero Member
*****

Reputation: +1261/-617
Offline Offline

Posts: 24433


Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!




Ignore
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2011, 02:55:47 am »

865 social security revenue - 707 social security benefits = 158 billion surplus. Entitlements are not causing the deficit.

Newsflash, noob.  When SS was formed, you had about a 70 percent chance of NOT seeing the age of 65.  Additionally, we had 8 people working for every 1 drawing SS.

Fast forward to today.  Now you have about a 70-75 percent chance of seeing 65, and we have 2.5 people working for every 1 drawing SS.  By 2025, it'll be under 2 workers for each recipient.

See a problem here?

Additionally, the "Social Insurance Tax" you point out covers SS, Medicare, etc.  Now consider that entitlement spending (SS, Medicare/Medicaid, UEI) adds up to $1.984 TRILLION.  That's a bit over a $1.1 T shortfall.

NOW do you see the problem?
Logged

“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford
formerlurker
Hero Member
*****

Reputation: +798/-827
Offline Offline

Posts: 9693





Ignore
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2011, 05:07:37 am »

865 social security revenue - 707 social security benefits = 158 billion surplus. Entitlements are not causing the deficit.

You forgot medicare, medicaid and unemployment.   

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

CONSERVATIVE CAVE

E-Mail the Administrator

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such materials available in an effort to advance understanding of current issues. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest in receiving the included information for educational or informational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use,’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Please refer to this link for DMCA Information
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
SimplePortal 2.0.4 © [SiNaN]

Minerva Theme | The Simple Machines Forum Directory
Page created in 0.214 seconds with 22 queries.